2021 IPSC Schedule

IPSC Schedule

August 4
12:00-12:15 EDT:
Opening Remarks

12:30-2:30 EDT:

Panel 1 — Health Policy:

Cynthia Ho, The COVID TRIPS Waiver and Beyond: A Re-evaluation of International & Domestic IP

Orit Fischman-Afori, Miriam Marcowitz-Bitton, Emily Michiko Morris, A Global Pandemic Remedy to Vaccine Nationalism

Bhumika Sharma, Harish Thakur, Mohammed Muqatdir, Traditional Knowledge vis-à-vis Social Justice during Pandemic

Rachel E. Sachs, The Accidental Innovation Policymakers

David A. Simon, Evidence-Based Regulation of Off-Label Information


Panel 2 — Copyright Enforcement:

Faye Fangfei Wang, Resolving Copyright-related Cases Over the Internet with the Assistance of Artificial Intelligence in Europe

Elizabeth Townsend Gard, Creativity in the Shadow of the Case Act

Dmitry Karshtedt and Sean Pager, Volition and Intent in the Law of Direct Copyright Infringement


Panel 3 — Trademark Protection:

Irene Calboli, “Black Lives Matters” and “BLM” as Trademarks? An Empirical Review of Pending Applications and Considerations from an IP and Social Justice Perspective

Michael Birnhack, The Emergence of a Brand: A Case of Jaffa Oranges from Mandate Palestine

Alexandra J. Roberts, A Poetics of Trademarks

Mark A. Lemley and Mark P. McKenna, Trademark Spaces

Jennifer E. Rothman, Navigating the Identity Thicket: Trademark's Lost Theory of Personality, The Right of Publicity, and Preemption

 

August 4
3:00-5:00 EDT:

Panel 4 — Patenting Empirical Studies:

S. Sean Tu and Mark A. Lemley, What Litigators Can Teach the Patent Office About Pharmaceutical Patents

Runhua Wang, Do Patent Subsidy Policies Signal to Drive Patenting Propensity?

Jordi Goodman, Sy-STEM-ic Racism: An Exploration of Gender and Race Representation on University-Sponsored Patents

Samantha Zyontz, How Does Innovation Find a Way?: CRISPR Patenting During the Uncertainty of Interference Proceedings

Michael Frakes and Melissa F. Wasserman, Are NPEs More Likely to Assert Invalid Patents than Practicing Entities?


Panel 5 — Copyright, Distribution, and Access:

Jacob Victor, Copyright’s Law of Dissemination

Bita Amani and Mark Swartz, Cultivating Copyright Custodians for the Digital Age: Law, Libraries, and the Public Interest in Lending

Kylie Pappalardo, Copyright licensing and distribution in Australia’s screen industries

D.R. Jones, Under the Umbrella: Assessing Recent Court Decisions that Promote Public Access to the Law

Liam Sunner, How the European Union’s obligation to include and incorporate human rights as part of its external relations and trade of intellectual property, implies the inclusion of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities within this obligation


Panel 6 — Innovation and IP:

BJ Ard, Competing With and Without Intellectual Property in the Video Game Industry

Aman Gebru, Owning Innovations from Hackathons

Betsy Rosenblatt, IP Law in the Shadow of Norms

Lital Helman, Innovation and the Valley of Death

5:00-6:00 EDT:
Caricatures and (BYO) Cocktail Reception
Join us for an hour of fun greeting colleagues and watching our caricature artists draw your portraits (which will be yours to keep). Bring your favorite cocktail!


August 5
12:30-2:30 EDT:

Panel 7 — Patent Practice:

Janet Freilich, Technology and the Depth vs Breadth Tradeoff in Patent Practice

Liza Vertinsky, Artificial Intelligence, Patents and Competition

Karen E. Sandrik, Stop Ignoring Patents

Greg Reilly, Patent Scams

Lisa Larrimore Ouellette and Jonathan S. Masur, Active Learning in Patent Law: Teaching from a Problem-Focused Casebook

 
Panel 8 — Copyright and Data:

Sean Flynn, Andres Izquierdo, Mike Palmedo, Research Exceptions in Comparative Copyright Law

Amanda Levendowski, Resisting Face Surveillance

Isaac Rutenberg, The role of Intellectual Property in the evolution of Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies in Africa

Arunima Shastri, Analysing Deepfake’s distress on Intellectual Property Rights


Panel 9 — Crosscutting IP:

Derek E. Bambauer, Everything You Want: The Paradox of Tailored IP Regimes

Mala Chatterjee, Understanding Intellectual Property: Expression, Function, and Individuation

Dilip Sharma, Arbitrability of Intellectual Property Disputes

Mauritz Kop, Quantum Technology: Waiving or Pledging IP?


August 5
3:00-5:00 EDT:

Panel 10 — Patent Scope & Validity:

Stephanie Plamondon Bair, Smart Patent Claiming

Amy L. Landers, Design Patents: Representation as Subject Matter Scope

Lucas Osborn, Pluralizing the PHOSITA in Patent Law


Panel 11 — Copyright Protection:

Rebecca Curtin, The Art (History) of Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.

Nina Srejovic, Copyright Protection for Works in the Language of Life

Tesh W. Dagne, Vying for the New Harvest: Access to and Control over Agricultural Data and the Role of Copyright

Zvi S. Rosen, Administering Copyright

 

Panel 12 — Identity, Data, and Privacy:

Dustin Marlan, The Dystopian Right of Publicity

Bita Amani, Authoring Identity: Copyright, Privacy, and Commodity Dissonance in the Digital Age

Victoria Schwartz, Joint Privacy

Uri Y. Hacohen, User-Generated Data Network Effects


August 11
12:30-2:30 EDT:

Panel 13 — Patents and the Courts:

Christa Laser, Getting to Many Minds in Patent Law: Should We End the Federal Circuit’s Exclusive Jurisdiction?

J. Jonas Anderson, Paul Gugliuzza, Jason Rantanen, An Empirical Study of Petitions for Writs of Mandamus at the Federal Circuit

Jeremy Bock, Forcing Review

J. Jonas Anderson, Court Competition on Steroids: The Patent Pilot Program’s Judge-Sized Loophole

Amy Semet, How Do Administrative Patent Judges Make Decisions?


Panel 14 — Copyright Authorship & Ownership:

Timothy J. McFarlin, A Copyright Ignored? Mark Twain, Mary Ann Cord, and the Meaning of Authorship

Shani Shisha, Copyright Pragmatism

Sarah Polcz, Coauthorship for Minor Contributors: Empirical Evidence of Efficiency

Eva E. Subotnik, Graven Instructions: Deconstructing the Posthumous Control of Visual Art

Guy Rub, The Challenges of Posthumous Moral Rights


Panel 15 — Digital Platforms:

Niva Elkin-Koren, Giovanni De Gregorio, Maayan Perel, Social Media as Contractual Networks: A Bottom up Check on Content Moderation

Eric Goldman, Validating Transparency Reports

Sari Mazzurco, Platform Regulation Through The Consumer Prism

Caroline Wanjiru Muchiri, Staying outside the Box: E-commerce Platforms, their Innovations and the Intellectual Property Framework in Kenya

Cathy Gellis, War Games Reboot: How Hollywood's Influence Undermines Cybersecurity


August 11
3:00-5:00 EDT:

Panel 16 — Licensing:

Brian J. Love, Yassine Lefouili, Christian Helmers, Do Standard-Essential Patent Owners Behave Opportunistically? Evidence from U.S. District Court Dockets

Bernard Chao and Tod Duncan, Why Patent Monopsonies Increase Consumer Welfare

Joy Y. Xiang, IP Licensing, Antitrust Law, and Access to Essential Technologies


Panel 17 — Copyright Substantial Similarity:

Clark D. Asay, An Empirical Study of Copyright Law’s Substantial Similarity Test

Bruce E. Boyden, The Enduring Appeal of “Total Concept and Feel”

Edward Lee and Andrew Moshirnia, Musicians v. Judges: Testing the Knowledge Effect in Music Cases


Panel 18 — Trademark Liability:

Barton Beebe, Roy Germano, Christopher Jon Sprigman, Joel H. Steckel, The Role of Consumer Uncertainty in Trademark Law: An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation

Jake Linford, Justin Sevier, Allyson Willis, Sex, Drugs, and Trademark Tarnishmyths

Luminita Olteanu, The ‘trade-mark-law-as-innovation-catalyst’ trap: why it would be wise to conceptualise innovation outside the realms of branding and dilution protection

Robert W. Woods and Derek E. Bambauer, Is the Bloom Off the “Tea Rose”? Reevaluating the Tea Rose Doctrine for the 21st Century

Rebecca Tushnet, House Brands: The History of an Idea


August 12
12:30-2:30 EDT:

Panel 19 — Patentability:

Laura G. Pedraza-Fariña and Ryan Whalen, The Ghost in the Patent System: Why Courts Struggle to Define Patent Law’s “Ordinary Artisan” and How A Network Approach Can Fix It

Sepehr Shahshahani, The (Mis)Measure of Follow-On Innovation

Richard Gruner, Lost in Patent Wonderland with Alice: Finding the Way Out

Dean Alderucci and Lidiya Mishchenko, AI Techniques to Analyze Written Description and Enablement Rejections

Tabrez Y. Ebrahim, Datafication at the Patent Office


Panel 20 — Copyright Theory:

Shyamkrishna Balganesh, The Institutionalist Turn in Supreme Court Copyright Jurisprudence

Stephen Yelderman, The Supreme Court’s Fragile Copyright Law

Xiyin Tang, Privatizing Copyright

Glynn S. Lunney, Jr., Transforming Fair Use

Lisa Macklem, A Tale of Two Cases: A Fairer Approach for Creativity and Innovation


Panel 21 — AI and Algorithms:

Sarit K. Mizrahi, But the Thingamabob That Does the Job is Dialogue: On Originality in Human-Machine Collaborations

Andres Sawicki, An AI’s Responses to Prompts about AI Authorship, Inventorship, and Ownership of IP

Dan L. Burk, Cheap Creativity and What It Will Do

Tiffany Li, Algorithmic Shadow Harms

Elizabeth A. Rowe, Procuring Transparency


August 12
3:00-5:00 EDT:

Panel 22 — Patent Litigation Empirical Studies:

Shawn P. Miller, Incorporation and Inventor Patent Litigation

Paul R. Gugliuzza and Rachel Rebouché, Gender Inequality in Patent Litigation

David L. Schwartz, Ted Sichelman, Richard Miller, USPTO Patent Number and Case Code File Dataset Documentation


Panel 23 — Creativity and Culture:

Peter Lee, Autonomy, Copyright, and the Structure of Creative Production

Amy Adler and Jeanne Fromer, Memes on Memes

Madhavi Sunder, Intellectual Property Is Theft!

Trevor Reed, Restorative Licensing

JohnJohn Uket, Transforming policymakers into innovators in the Civil Service of developing countries


Panel 24 — Remedies:

Thomas F. Cotter, Nominal Damages—and Nominal Damages Workarounds—in Intellectual Property Law

Matthew Sag and Pamela Samuelson, Hysteresis: An Empirical Study of Copyright Injunctions After eBay v. MercExchange

Jorge L. Contreras, An American Compulsory License: Coming to Terms with Ongoing Patent Infringement Following Denial of an Injunction in the post-eBay Era

John Jarosz and Jorge Contreras, Preliminary Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases: Repairing Irreparable Harm